🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.