🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align so closely with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from chaos. While the character's name a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this same narrative rather than undercutting it. An adaptation based on a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a selection process with many contenders. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who researched his rise, the future president merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. His harder interpretation prompted local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.